Dashboard/Nigel Farage/BBC News interview: the £5m gift and Reform's money
Interview · 2 Sep 2026

BBC News interview: the £5m gift and Reform's money

Nigel Farage, MP for Clacton, Leader of Reform UK

Video: YouTube: BBC Politics (official channel). Retrieved 2 Oct 2026.

25 BS INDEX 0 100
Mostly straight talkProvisional
263 sentences · 16 checked claims · 49 questions
Claim checkedClaim found, not checkedEmotional passage flagged as deflectingEmotional passage, fits the subject

The words of Nigel Farage. Transcript from the video's captions, fetched on 2026-10-02; not an official record. Captions do not say who is speaking: Polifiles assigned each turn by reading the captions, without checking the audio. The video opens with a preview clip that is repeated later; the preview is left out. Captions are auto-generated, so some names are misspelt (for example Clton for Clacton). Trimmed: starts at "Nah, welcome back to Parliament.". Questions are shown in grey boxes. Tap a marked sentence to see the label and its sources. Other speakers' full contributions are in the video.

BBC interviewer
Nah, welcome back to Parliament. You've been sworn in again as a MP. Um, what on earth was the point of that bi-election over the summer?

Well, I was in a really peculiar situation where, you know, the standards committee were investigating me. You could ask me questions about it. I'm not allowed to answer under the rules. I heard someone, Lucy Pal say, it could take up for up to a year for there to be a decision on this. And so, I'm being judged guilty every single day by the media, by everybody.

I'm guilty. Well, not just of that, of almost everything. And so I said, you know what? Whilst Westminster obsesses about money, about security, about whether this was political or personal, and it goes on every day. Do you know what we'll do?

We'll ask the people. I will let the people of Clton, the voters, be the judge.

AnsweredAsked what the point of the summer by-election was. The reply gives a reason: with the standards investigation likely to take up to a year, he wanted voters to judge.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
The thing is though, we knew you were popular in Clton before because you won in 2024. The bi-election proves that you still are. But we're back where we started, aren't we? I mean, that investigation trundles on. All of the questions continue. And actually, the people in Clton were asked to come to a judgment before they know the outcome of that investigation.

Well, I mean that investigation the outcome. Have you seen us on the committee? I think we know the outcome already.

I'm not I'm not going to say any more than that, but if you

Partly answeredTold that the investigation continues and voters judged before its outcome. The reply suggests the committee's outcome is already known, without addressing whether voters could judge fairly before it.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

look at the composition. If you look at the political composition of the committee, uh I thought before they gave a judgment, we'd ask the people to give a judgment. And look, a lot has changed since I called that bi-election. A lot has changed. you know, the horrible murder of Anne Whitikham, the quite rightly increased security around politics and politicians in this country.

I think at least I shall say this when I meet them, give the answers that are needed.

BBC interviewer
You made a significant charge though against the integrity of the privileges committee of those who might look at uh look at this case in the coming in the coming months. To be clear, you're suggesting you don't think they're going to give you a fair hearing.

I wasn't prepared to wait for up to a year for that committee with its political background makeup to come to their decision.

Partly answeredAsked to confirm he does not expect a fair hearing. The reply says he would not wait for a committee with its political make-up, without stating plainly whether he expects a fair hearing.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
But before we get to that, there's the standards commissioner himself. Do you have faith in him to be able to impartially look at this?

I have no questions about him.

AnsweredAsked whether he has faith in the Standards Commissioner. The reply says he has no questions about him.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

But I do think, you know, and and probably Boris Johnson might say the same. I do think that to be judged by members of parliament of other political parties who you're fighting against in bi-elections or general elections. I I think that raises the question. I I really do. And I think if we're going to have I mean looking ahead, we're going to have standards.

I mean surely we need to have people who are actually apolitical making those decisions. That's what I would suggest. Look, it is what it is. But I wasn't prepared to wait a year or what, however long it was going to take with literally the media judging me every day. And it's interesting since the Clton bi-election with an increased number of votes, which in the middle of August wasn't a bad thing to do, many of those questions have gone away.

BBC interviewer
Have you been interviewed by the Sunday commissioner yet?

No.

AnsweredAsked whether the Commissioner has interviewed him yet. The reply says no.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Presumably you'd want to be. You'd be saying, "Call me in. I'm happy to talk."

No. And I've said that and that will happen.

AnsweredAsked whether he wants to be interviewed. The reply says he has said so and it will happen.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Have you got a date yet?

That will happen.

Partly answeredAsked whether a date has been set. The reply says it will happen but gives no date.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
It's coming soon then, is it?

That will happen. I mean, I was actually written to by him within three hours of the result in Clton. So, so with offering a date or saying he's up and running. Well, you know, maybe now, but maybe now this thing will actually move a bit faster.

Partly answeredAsked whether the interview is coming soon. The reply says the Commissioner wrote within hours of the result and things may now move faster, without a date.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Sounds like you're going to be interviewed imminently.

It won't be too long.

AnsweredAsked whether the interview is imminent. The reply says it will not be long.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Let's take a step back from the specifics. Let's talk about money. Does it matter to you where reform gets its money from?

Well, I mean, I think the fact that we're not offering any peeres, you know, I mean, just have a look at the last 30 years of British politics. You give money, you get a peer. Can I promise you something? All the big donors that have given money to reform, not a single one of them will go to the House of Lords. Not one.

I promise you these people, successful entrepreneurs in their own right, are giving money to reform because they share the same analysis as ours, which is Britain is broken. You cannot trust the people that broke it to put it back together again. And we need fresh thinking, new people, a much more radical politics. and a politics that doesn't just make promises to get elected, but makes promises that it genuinely intends to deliver on. And so, as I say, you know, our sources of money come from successful people who really care about the country.

Partly answeredAsked whether it matters where Reform gets its money. The reply says donors will not be given peerages and share the party's analysis, but does not say whether the source of money matters.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
And I want to get on to your pitch and the arguments that you'll be making at your conference in the in the coming days shortly. Let's ask specifically about the5 million pound gift from Christopher Harbornne, the uh billionaire that is at the heart of this investigation by the by the standards commissioner. Have you ever in the last couple of months looked in the mirror and thought, you know what, maybe I could have saved myself one heck of a lot of hassle if I just declared that?

Well, I could have done, but I didn't need to. And I took strong legal advice on it. This was purely personal. It was given no strings attached. It was unconditional, but the intention was very clear that I am someone who the state, despite being asked repeatedly to help, just refuses to do so.

And I'm going to need a degree of security for as long as I live. It's just as simple as that. It wasn't a political donation. It wasn't used to fight a campaign or anything like that. So I think my judgment was right and you know if they find me guilty they find me guilty of not filling in a piece of paper I guess.

And by the way I haven't broken a law haven't broken tax laws haven't taken a penny of public money. Do you know my personal expenses in the first two years of being an MP is zero zero there's no public money involved. You know I I am utterly convinced I have done nothing wrong.

AnsweredAsked whether declaring the £5m gift would have saved trouble. The reply says he could have but did not need to, on legal advice, because the gift was personal.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
I guess the question is that rules say if in doubt declare it and when you got that money granted you weren't an MP. Uh but you were putting out videos about channel migrants. You were the honorary president of Reform UK. You've been the majority shareholder in Reform UK for years. We now know that you were talking to the party's then leader Richard Ty about the party's finances. I mean that's pretty political.

Not really. No. No. I mean going I mean just remember I've had a career as a journalist as well. You know, I've done LBC shows for years.

I've done GB news shows for years. I've written for newspapers, you know,

AnsweredTold that his party roles made the gift political. The reply disagrees and points to his media career.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
but if in doubt, declare it. It's

Well, I wasn't in doubt. I wasn't in doubt on good legal advice. That's the point.

AnsweredTold the rule is to declare when in doubt. The reply says he was not in doubt, on legal advice.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
I mean, was it good legal advice given what's happened since? Because there seems to be a doubt about whether you should. That's why there's an investigation.

Well, the investigation is not legal. The invest This is not a legal investigation.

Partly answeredAsked whether the legal advice was good given the investigation. The reply says the investigation is not a legal one, without addressing whether the advice was sound.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
And this is the crux of this, isn't it? because maybe you were seeking advice from the wrong people because you were seeking the advice of lawyers, but this is the political sphere. You know this, you've been in it for decades and uh and you and you know that people will ask sharp questions, not least because plenty of MPs say, "Look, if we can declare stuff because the rules suggest if in doubt declare it, then then so should Nigel Farah."

I don't know of any other MP that's faced the threats that I've faced over the course of the last decade and more and will do for many years to come.

DodgedTold that other MPs expect anything in doubt to be declared. The reply turns to the threats he has faced, which the interviewer notes is not the question.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
And that's profound and it is significant, but it's not the question, is it? The question is whether or not you should have declared the money. If you declared the money and said, "Yeah, look, I'm going to spend it on my security because of the threats you face." Yeah, this conversation would be very different.

Well, look, I firmly believe I have broken no rules, done nothing wrong. This is a matter of interpretation, I guess, for the standards committee. We'll let them decide.

AnsweredAsked again whether he should have declared the money. The reply says he believes he broke no rules and the committee will decide.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Do you anticipate there could be a whole other bi-election again because or or does the one that's happened mean you think that's less less likely? You know, if there's a scenario where you're found against [snorts] and there's a suggestion of a recall petition, the people in Cton are going to say, "Oh, we've done all that." Or put you through it all again.

I'm not going to speculate on that. I'm just not.

Declined openlyAsked whether a recall petition or another by-election could follow. The reply says he will not speculate.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
You think it might happen again?

I wouldn't have thought so, but I'm not going to speculate.

AnsweredAsked whether another by-election might happen. The reply says he would not have thought so.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
on the whole question of the money questions. There was some focus groups done in your constituency over the summer and look clearly you won and you won handsomely but more in common were suggesting that some floating potential reform supporters and I guess this question stretches beyond your constituency were expressing doubts because of all of this swirl of money whereas others whereas others just to be clear and to be fair of your more solid supporters believe this idea that they felt that this was people out to get you. Does all of this restrict your capacity to broaden your support?

What we've had since May the 8th and May the 8th is significant because on May the 7th we wiped out the tries in East Anglia. We took down the Labour party in the Midlands of the North. We got rid of K Starmmer. I knew on May the 8th Starmmer couldn't survive ever since that moment. I mean we've been under assault in the most extraordinary way.

You know questions about Richard Ty individual bank transactions of Richard Ty being published in newspapers. Astonishing. Astonishing.

DodgedAsked whether the questions about money limit his ability to widen support. The reply turns to the May election results and the scrutiny of the party, not to whether support is limited.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Is it astonishing though? Because I mean

well the fact that illegally obtained information is published all over Sunday newspapers is astonishing. So

AnsweredAsked whether the scrutiny is really astonishing. The reply says publishing illegally obtained information is.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
about scrutiny is inevitable, isn't it? Because you're a candidate for prime minister and Richard Ty is a candidate for deputy prime minister.

So So does that mean his bank account should be exposed to the whole world. His bank transactions should be exposed to the whole world.

Partly answeredTold scrutiny is inevitable for candidates for Prime Minister and deputy. The reply answers with a question about whether bank transactions should be public.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
What I'm saying is the scrutiny is in

what I'm saying is this. There's been a willful attempt and it's gone on now for months to say that everything to do with reform that every individual involved with reform is somehow a crook. That's been the attempt that's been made.

Partly answeredInterviewer begins to say the scrutiny is legitimate. The reply says there has been a deliberate attempt to portray everyone in Reform as a crook.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
That's an exaggeration, isn't it? Is asking it's asking searching questions and seeking answers.

I I honestly don't think so. They've questioned who our donors are. They've questioned, you know, individuals within the organization. Uh, you know, we have not been found to be in breach of anything, but it's gone on for week after week after week. And so, when that happens, it's not surprising that more in common will find some people in Clton asking questions.

AnsweredAsked whether that is an exaggeration. The reply says he does not think so and gives reasons.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

Is that all? Surely there's more than this.

BBC interviewer
The the the Fiona Cotle, the mum of your friend George Cotl, the convicted fraudster. Two donations of 250,000 [clears throat] from Richard Ty's business. Mr. saying the money was given to his firm by Fiona Kotchell. Do you know if the money that Fiona Kotchel donated was hers or came from her son George?

I believe it was her money. I wasn't leader at the time. I wasn't involved in the transactions, but I absolutely believe her when she says it was her money. And by the way, these investigations,

AnsweredAsked whether the donated money was Fiona Cottrell's or her son's. The reply says he believes it was hers and he was not leader at the time.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
you know, I suppose there's a potential difference there.

How can anybody ever know anything?

DodgedTold there may be a difference between believing and knowing. The reply asks how anyone can know anything.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
But you need to be more curious about

I have been told it's her money. So, do I know? Yes, I believe I know as much as I possibly can. The point is we live in a complainant society. If you complain about me, automatically that triggers an investigation.

So, we're under investigation every day for virtually everything we do because the other political parties are constantly writing to all the authorities. There's a big picture here. The old two-party system that has dominated, frankly, since the end of the First World War feels for the first time it faces an existential threat. And think about what goes with that. It isn't just being an MP.

It isn't just being in government. It's who goes to the House of Lords, who heads up the Quangos, who gets the government contracts. You know, there is a whole ecosystem with a century of development around this. and we come along from virtually nowhere and threaten the whole thing. So I think what you're seeing is the establishment in a very coordinated way fighting back.

But you know something, it isn't going to work.

Partly answeredTold he should be more curious about the money's source. The reply says he was told it was hers, then turns to complaints from other parties.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Doesn't that sound a bit conspiracy theory like that this the whole world's out to get us stuff.

Well, when you read in a newspaper, you're under scrut. When you read in a newspaper, you're under investigation and you don't even know a complaint's been made, you can see the degree of collusion that has gone on between interested parties. Look, this is the way humanity works. If you've got a new idea in business, in science, in politics, all through the centuries, the establishment that exists will attack you. And that's what's been happening since those dramatic results we had on May the 7th.

Am I surprised by it? Not particularly.

AnsweredAsked whether this sounds like a conspiracy theory. The reply says newspapers report investigations before complaints are known, and describes the establishment attacking newcomers.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
If if that thesis, if you like, if there's something in that thesis, isn't it wouldn't it be logical for you and for for reform to ensure that that is minimized by making sure that there's the checks and balances, making sure as you scale up, and granted you're trying to do that very quickly and that's difficult. That there's the infrastructure, the chief executives, the chief of staffs, the the scrutiners who can ask tough questions in terms. Oh, we're building and building and building. This this kind of stuff implies that that's not really there.

No. And it'll keep coming. This won't stop. Every single thing we do will be questioned in all sorts of ways. This will not stop.

They will continually try and do this to us.

Partly answeredAsked whether Reform should build checks and balances as it grows. The reply says the attacks will continue, without addressing the party's own checks.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Who's they?

I'm talking about normal human behavior. People who people who hold positions of power, influence, and money don't want new kids on the block succeeding.

AnsweredAsked who 'they' are. The reply says people who hold power and money and do not want newcomers to succeed.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
So, I'm doing this, but I want to I'm curious about

it's the whole ecosystem. It's the whole ecosystem.

Partly answeredInterviewer asks for specifics. The reply says it is the whole ecosystem.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
So the institutions who who who who in this apparent web of collusion

the House of Commons, the House of Lords,

People who get appointed to all sorts of wonderful positions in the public sector. This is the way that it works. And by the way, very similar things happened to Trump in America. They went after him for year after year after year. And we've sat and talked about this.

you know, going back two years, we expected there to be these sort of attacks.

AnsweredAsked which institutions are involved. The reply names the House of Commons and the House of Lords.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
You and Donald Trump have sat down and talked about the specifics of

I haven't actually discussed this with him, right? But I can see the similarities because again, he was an outsider. He wasn't part of the system. So, look, we've had to weather this for the last few months. I have little doubt that the attacks won't stop.

But I am utterly confident asking your question that in terms of the growth, the professionalization of this organization, our compliance checks, all of those things, I think we're in a strong place. I genuinely do.

AnsweredAsked whether he discussed this with Trump. The reply says he has not, then adds the party's compliance is in a strong place.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Last question on the specifics around money. Why was Reform's bank account frozen a couple of weeks out from the general election?

It's very common. About the fifth time it's happened to us. Happened to us all the time. Happened to us in UKIP. Happened to us in the Brexit party.

Um I was debanked personally. uh refused by refused by 10 banks to even give me an account.

Partly answeredAsked why Reform's bank account was frozen before the election. The reply says this is common and has happened about five times, without giving the reason this time.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
The banking world have you found out? Do you know?

Why was I debunkked?

Partly answeredAsked whether he found out why. The reply asks which case is meant.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
No, no. I'm talking specifically about the I mean, you've spoken we've spoken at length about about about your particular case reforms bank account in the weeks before the election because that's a big deal

because complaints get made. We're living in a complainant society. you know, if I contact your bank and you've had a big transaction go into your account. I I think Chris is moneyaundering, you know, they will suspend your account pending an investigation. That's the world we live in.

AnsweredAsked again about the party's account. The reply says complaints trigger account suspensions pending investigation.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
I'm fascinated by this idea of a component society and it'll resonate with some people, but there's a line, isn't there? And I'm wondering where you think it should be drawn. This is a wider question than the critic the questions [clears throat] you face as a party and more about your vision if you like for the UK as prime minister to win a general election. Where did we cross a line that goes too far in terms of the checks and balances that allow people to ask searching questions of institutions?

Well, on money for example, on money, for example, you know, a series of European Union directives on money laundering have literally clogged up much of our banking system and there are still 300,000 people a year being debanked in this country. Why? Because an unusual transaction appears in their accounts and everyone's terribly fearful uh that, you know, they're going to be investigated as a bank. So they then report every unusual transaction to the National Crime Agency. Uh accounts get frozen, bank accounts get closed.

We've literally we are clogging ourselves up. Uh and it's and it's a terrible terrible mistake.

AnsweredAsked where checks on institutions go too far. The reply gives money-laundering rules and debanking as the example.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Let's talk about the wider political landscape as we head into conference season. Um have things got a bit tougher with a new prime minister for reform?

It's too early to tell, isn't it? I mean, if there is a burn and bounce, tell you what, it's not very big. It's not very big.

AnsweredAsked whether the new Prime Minister has made things tougher. The reply says it is too early to tell and any bounce is small.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
You were you were top of opinion polls for ages and ages and ages and they've topped a few. Granted, it's early days for the new prime minister, but he's a different ch different proposition.

He is different to Kia Starmmer. Um Star was, I don't know, just a bit robotic perhaps sometimes in terms of his delivery. Um Bernham is appears to be more personable, but his analysis of what's wrong with the country is completely completely looking in the wrong place. uh the idea you know four decades of neoliberalism and he's blaming the labor governments too over that period and there's a confusion here because ever since Makerfield which he won well ever since Makerfield he's come up with this 40 years of failure we need radical change we need more government intervention etc and you think wow this is the most radical prime minister since that and then John Healey who's the chancellor says this is a Labor government of continuity with a different leader Well, which is it? And I don't know.

I'm not quite sure Andy Bernham knows. And and and and you know, I predicted back in September 24 a spring 27 general election forced on the government by the credit markets and I still very very strongly hold to that.

AnsweredTold the new Prime Minister is a different proposition. The reply compares the two leaders and restates his prediction of a 2027 election.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
You've had an extraordinary couple of years in many senses dominating politics contributing to the downfall of the the last prime minister. But has momentum stalled a bit for you? Recent bi-election results? Clearly you've just won one but second in Makerfield, third in our broth and broughty ferry, third in Abedine South, second in Gson and Denton. The whole front runner thing isn't happening with quite the frequency.

I mean Gorton Denton was never winnable and Makerfield was a seat we done very well in in the local elections. But look just as we said vote reform gets star out, it was vote burden get Star out, you know. So we were slightly hoisted with our own patard. If you look at the weekly bi-election results and every Thursday there are half a dozen bi-elections that take place, you will see our percentage average vote share is very very consistent. Uh we're doing well.

I've got huge plans for the autumn big autumn campaign that we're going to fight. Uh are we down a bit from last year? Yes. But you know, markets don't move in straight lines. Uh and I do genuinely think that the level of professionalization of training that is going on in the part is putting us in good in a good place.

No, no, there's more to do. There is a lot more to do. And I get that. I mean, this time last year, it was just myself and Richard as deputy. You know, I've now appointed four frontline shadow cabinet positions.

I've got leaders in Scotland, leaders in Wales. It's not quite yet the finished object. I'll be the first to admit that. But we are making very rapid progress. you know, finding the right people to come in.

You know, just being an MP is not necessarily the qualification for taking on a big cabinet position. So, we are looking outside of the political sphere to try to find the right people. But you know what's really interesting and and we've put out loads of policies over the course of the last month and the Conservatives put out loads of policies and Andy Bernham has put out an infinite number of ideas and policies since he became the prime minister. I don't think the public are interested. I think what they want to know is who is actually going to deliver, who is actually going to do something.

And what I'm going to say at our conference is the Tories had 14 years and went back on nearly all of their promises. Andy Bernham says he needs 10 years to turn the country around. If we win the general election, we will in the first 100 days put in place some fundamental changes to the direction of this country and if the cabinet ministers that I appoint to do those jobs don't deliver, they will be zacked.

AnsweredAsked whether momentum has stalled. The reply explains recent by-elections and accepts the party is down a bit.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
I suppose a curiosity with that pitch around the desire for a speed of delivery, the kind of speed of delivery lots of uh our audience will associate with day-to-day life when you can book stuff online that arrives the day after etc etc. Is does it not run straight into the very thing you were grumbling about about five minutes ago about this idea of the complainant society or indeed that the sense that that there's there's institutions out there that are out that are out to get you. In other words, that could styy the very thing you want to do.

If we're specific, if we are absolutely specific in a manifesto and get a mandate for that and get a mandate for that, then I think the truth is that the civil service in the House of Lords have to say, "Look, we're a democratic society." I think the problem is that governments get elected being slightly vague about what they want to do and then they put it to civil servants who say, "Well, it's all very complicated. It's all very difficult. We we are going to be absolutely explicit." And this conference begins that process. Direct accountability. We will deliver these things in a 100 days or those ministers will lose their jobs.

They won't get promoted upwards. They'll be chucked onto the backbenches. Dead simple.

AnsweredAsked whether fast delivery would run into the institutions he complains about. The reply says a specific manifesto mandate would have to be accepted.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Is reform a happy ship at the moment? Over the summer, you publicly uh took Zia Ysef to task for that remark, calling a former defense secretary a traitor. Um there's clearly this anxiety that you've expressed around uh you know the the as you see it the mud that's being thrown at you by your critics. So is it a happy ship? It doesn't always come across as that.

It's very happy and those that feed newspaper stories that it's not are not in the inner circle or at the heart of this party and you know

AnsweredAsked whether Reform is a happy ship. The reply says it is.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
is there an inner circle sometimes it feels like there's you and there's Richard and there's Robert Generick and there's Zia but all those operating individual

there is oh I allow people freedom absolutely I don't tell Richard Ty what to do or or Robert Generick what to do I let them get on with the with with with the appointments they've got but in terms of the internal structures of the party, be it the Treasury Department, be it the marketing department, be it at the fundraising department, be it all those things. It's very tight. It's very united. I have absolutely no question about any of that. And and and I think we're in good shape.

AnsweredAsked whether there is an inner circle. The reply says he lets senior figures run their areas and the party is united.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
And what about the the image that the electorate see of you and indeed the wider party? There was a bit of a critique over the summer, some of it articulated privately, some of it publicly about about the tone being struck and whether the better reform in Nigel Farage is a a sunnier and more optimistic one or an agrieved one.

Well, I do take that point and I have been agrieved over the summer. I'm very agrieved and that's not because of political reasons. That's because of that's because of my family and the extent to which my family and I'm not going to say a lot. Uh but various members of my family have beenounded. Uh oh, debanked.

Another huge bout of debanking of my family has gone on. Uh threats to the personal security of my family and in some cases that the media treating those very close to me in a way that I don't think is acceptable. Have I been pretty ratty over that and upset over that? I would accept. Hands up.

I might not have quite been my normal self over the last few months, but you know, when it's your own family, it's close to home. Listen, I've been around forever in this game. You know that I'm big enough. I'm big enough and ugly enough to take the rough and tumble in the game. I've generally, you know, gone through politics with a smile, whatever's happened.

But some of those personal things over the last few months have have weighed very heavily.

AnsweredAsked whether his tone has been aggrieved. The reply accepts it has, and explains why.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
And people will sympathize on a human level with that and why that might have articulated itself in an agrieved tone. But in a political sense, are you hoping that are you wanting to sort of change the record tonally and and do you recognize the political risk of coming across as a grieve that might might put off some people curious but not yet convinced?

I'll tell you what I'll do. I'll go back to doing what I've been doing for the last 34 years.

AnsweredAsked whether he will change his tone. The reply says he will go back to his usual approach, which the interviewer takes as a yes.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

Then you look look, I've been very very upset. There are stories that I can't talk to you about which will emerge in the next few weeks and months. And I think when you and others see them, they might begin to understand why I've been so upset.

BBC interviewer
I want to ask you briefly about Anne Whitikham, your former colleague figure, hugely liked and respected in in [clears throat] many political circles and in particular something you were talking about over the summer which was a firebombing of one of your houses and a concern over and above the seriousness of that of a connection between that and Anikham's murder. Is there anything more you can say about that?

No. But that remains something that well clearly is under investigation. That is currently under investigation by counterterrorism. And I at this stage would decline to comment other than to say that the world is becoming a much more dangerous place in not just politics but public life as a whole. I think is becoming a much more dangerous and difficult place.

Um and you know we have I think we normally place enormous trust on our police and our intelligence services just occasionally there are questions.

Declined openlyAsked whether there is more to say about a possible link between the firebombing of his house and the murder of a former colleague. The reply says it is under counter-terrorism investigation and declines to comment.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
You have previously sounded reassured by some of the conversations you've had most recently with with the police and the security since Anne's murder.

Uh we have had a much more open reception from the authorities than we have before. I think there's a feeling that Richard Ty has articulated that perhaps in the past we weren't treated as seriously as perhaps we should have been. I think there is a big change and that's very welcome.

AnsweredAsked whether he is reassured by recent contact with the police. The reply says the authorities have been more open.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Is your security being scaled up in terms of what the state's offering?

No.

AnsweredAsked whether his state security is being increased. The reply says no.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Final question, big broad political question. The autumn, the coming months, the conference, what message do you want to land with our audience? say between now and Christmas in the coming months the new prime minister we're into the conference season the battle of ideas you anticipate a general election sooner rather than later what's the big pitch and whenever that election comes it's your name on the ticket you're definitely going to be the leader going into that election even if it's in 2029 yeah

yes it's my responsibility I will be there I will have to carry the can whichever way it goes our message is very very simple uh we are people of serious intent uh be from outside the political system or those that served as cabinet ministers and resigned their positions. Uh and they're taking a huge risk too because this is what we're saying. We are saying we have had government after government elected for the sake of being elected. We are in this with completely different motives. We're in this to turn the country around.

Britain is broken. It's in serious decline. A majority of people know it. And if you vote for us, we will deliver.

AnsweredAsked for his main message and whether he will lead into the election. The reply says yes and sets out the message.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
BBC interviewer
Do you think you're going to win the next election?

Every chance. Yes.

AnsweredAsked whether he will win the next election. The reply says yes, every chance.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person