Dashboard/Kemi Badenoch/ITV News interview with Robert Peston: Reform voters, the triple lock and the Green Party
Interview · 6 Oct 2026

ITV News interview with Robert Peston: Reform voters, the triple lock and the Green Party

Kemi Badenoch, Leader of the Opposition

Video: YouTube: ITV News (official channel). Retrieved 7 Oct 2026.

No BS Index for this transcript
Only 13 rated questions; a transcript needs 15 for a number. Claims that held up: 74% of 17 checked (Bluff 13.2 of 50). Its claims still count towards the overall score.
Claim checkedClaim found, not checkedEmotional passage flagged as deflectingEmotional passage, fits the subject

The words of Kemi Badenoch. Transcript from the video's captions, fetched on 2026-10-07; not an official record. Captions do not say who is speaking: Polifiles assigned each turn by reading the captions, without checking the audio. ITV News' upload of the full interview recorded at the Conservative conference in Birmingham (10 minutes); a short opening teaser that repeats two later answers (the Green Party, the triple lock) is left out, and so are the closing thanks. The presenter is named in the video description (ITV News' Political Editor Robert Peston) and in the captions ("So, Robert", "Thank you, Robert"). Turns assigned by meaning rather than the '>>' marks; where the voices overlap, her one-word replies ("Absolutely", "Yes") are kept as her turns and a stray "Well" before "honest" is left with his question. Trimmed: starts at "Can we say good to see you?"; ends at "pick me if they had to choose between the two of them.". Questions are shown in grey boxes. Tap a marked sentence to see the label and its sources. Other speakers' full contributions are in the video.

Robert Peston
Can we say good to see you? As you know, I get confused very easily. Um you say you want to win back reform voters and if I'm sure you're aware the average income in Clacton Farage's seat is around 40,000. Your policy of um ending the withdrawal of child care support, that helps uh homes with incomes of a penny less than 200,000 lbs. What you're about to do tomorrow on inheritance tax, that'll benefit 1 in 20 people with assets of more than a a million. What's in it for reform voters?

Well, I haven't actually announced policies for tomorrow. You are guessing. You will have to wait and see what is actually announced. But let's take the

Partly answeredAsked what Conservative policies on childcare and inheritance tax offer Reform voters on lower incomes. Says the inheritance tax policy has not been announced and the interviewer is guessing; the question about Reform voters is taken up only after the follow-up.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
the broader point of of people on lower incomes, what are you doing for them?

but but that's a perfect example. We are doing something for everybody, whether you're retired or a pensioner earning 10,000 or 100,000 or 200,000, we have something for you. We are the party of people who are out there working hard and are aspirational. There are a lot of people in Clacton like that. There are reform voters all over the country and Labour voters and Lib Dem voters, too, who will be very attracted by the Conservative offer.

It is about making the country richer. We've had a system of just giving bumps to different groups of people. This is about having a

No, no, no, no, no, no, this is about No, it's about having a simpler, clearer system. We shouldn't have a cliff edge where you suddenly lose tens of 20,000 lbs worth of child care because you've had a 1 lb pay rise. That makes no sense. This affects teachers. If you're a deputy head and you want to become a head teacher, that has an impact on you.

I know it has impacted GPs. There are GPs who don't work more hours because they don't want to hit that cliff edge. That's not good for the NHS. So, we need to bring common sense back. It's not about attacking rich people or attacking people on 100,000.

What we're not doing is uh you know, trying to punish people for earning money. We want people to be rewarded for working harder.

Partly answeredAsked what the party is doing for people on lower incomes. Says there is something for everybody and describes a simpler system without the £100,000 childcare cliff edge, but names no measure aimed at lower earners.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
But my point is slightly different. I mean, from what I can see, what you're trying to do is win back richer southern households who are currently either voting Lib Dem or Labour or thinking of doing so. There's no shame in trying to woo those voters, is there?

What we're trying to do is grow our economy. The country is getting poorer and the only way we can make the country richer is by making sure people can go out, earn more money, be more productive and we want to strip the barriers away from that. So, Robert, I'm very sad I'm very sad I'm very sad that you're looking at this in crude electoral terms, but the fact is

That's That's That's the wrong way. That's how we've all got into this problem where we keep thinking about winning elections rather than thinking about what works. How do you run a country? That's the right way of doing things. That's why I've called my pamphlet The Right Way.

Let's fix the economy. Let's get business working. Let's get people out there earning more. Let's get people off welfare and into work. It's the complete opposite of what Labour's doing, by the way.

But that's the way that we're going to get Britain working again.

Partly answeredAsked whether the party is really trying to win back richer southern households. Says the aim is to grow the economy and rejects judging policy in electoral terms, without saying who the policies are meant to win over.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
But the problem with ignoring I mean, your advisers are telling you the electoral calculus says unless voters think that you are the main opposition and they currently see Reform as the main opposition, you're not going to you're not going to claw back.

If I I think that's actually the opposite of what's happening. I was told that actually you know, in polling people are seeing us as the only ones providing effective opposition to Labour. We're the ones who've got them to U-turn. You look at this early release of prisoners, for example. Until I had that press conference with those victims, Andy Burnham was going to let out pedophiles, killers, rapists, people like the killers of PC Andrew Harper.

We are forcing them to change tack. And I will keep doing my job as leader of the opposition. I've got to hold the government to account. Reform don't even have a defense spokesman. We have talked about how we're going to get a missile defense shield for the new age of warfare we're in.

We are the only serious alternative to Labour.

AnsweredAsked about advice that voters see Reform as the main opposition. Says the opposite is happening and gives reasons: polling, government U-turns, and Reform having no defence spokesman.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
but on that, you have basically said the priority is to win back the Tory reputation for economic

Absolutely.

Yes.

AnsweredAsked whether the priority is to win back a reputation for economic competence. Says yes.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
But you keep announcing these really pretty expensive spending commitments, whether it's the new missile protection system a billion a year, whether it is the exempt or halving national insurance for 21 to 24-year-olds, couple of billion. You're not even publishing your savings plan till tomorrow. It all feels a bit dodgy if I'm Well honest.

Well well actually, we have been setting out how we will pay for that. The plan for the missile defense system I've already set out about 3 weeks ago in September. You will remember I had lots of questions on it. And the difference between us and other parties is that I set out my plans. Other parties don't say anything because they're hoping just to sneak in.

I'm very happy to be challenged. I love it that you're asking me these questions because I can explain how it's all going to work. The missile defense shield

Partly answeredAsked how new spending commitments are paid for when the savings plan is not yet published. Says the plans have been set out, including the missile defence plan, without giving the funding source in the answer.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
So I'm going to have to wait for tomorrow to see the details.

for more. But on the missile defense system, we've put put that all out. We've explained how we're going to get to 3% on defense. We're the only party that has done that. Labour has kicked this into the long grass again until next year when we can see the threats facing our country right now.

Look at what happened in Fairford. Look at Iran shutting down a power plant. We need to get serious.

AnsweredAsked whether he must wait until tomorrow for the details. Says more will come, but the missile defence system and the route to 3% on defence have already been set out.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
But what if you were serious about controlling the public finances, you would do what your current shadow foreign secretary said you should do about a year ago, which is reform the triple lock.

Well, there are very respectable arguments on both sides about the triple lock.

Jessica No, no, no, no, there are respectable arguments on both sides. That is not the choice we are making. The triple lock is our policy. The choice we are making is focusing on people who can work but don't work. That is the area that is going to deliver the biggest bang for our buck, not chasing after elderly pensioners.

AnsweredAsked why not reform the triple lock, as a senior colleague once proposed. Says there are arguments on both sides, the triple lock is party policy, and the party is choosing to focus on people who can work but do not.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
Now, I've got to change the subject just in a couple of ways. Um your shadow home minister, Blake Stevenson, has said there are no-go zones in Luton, which is the kind of rhetoric from the far right that the police say is just wrong.

Well, um I don't know the context of Blake's uh of Blake's comments. Blake Stevenson is a very sensible Yes, he's a very sensible, very sensible MP. He's put out a lot of good stuff um on immigration.

Partly answeredAsked about a shadow minister's claim of no-go zones in Luton, which police reject. Says she does not know the context and praises the MP, without saying whether the claim is right.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
And Jenrick said something very similar when he was a member of the Tory party. He said there's a problem here, isn't

No, no, no, no, not not quite. Um if Blake Stevenson is saying there are no-go zones, he will have a reason for that, and I'm sure that he can explain it. So, I'm very happy to stand by him. Robert Jenrick is Nigel Farage's problem now. Nigel has done my spring cleaning.

Robert can go create all his problems over there. I'm very happy to stand by what Blake Stevenson said.

Partly answeredAsked whether this is the same rhetoric as Robert Jenrick's. Says she stands by the MP and that he will have a reason, then turns to Jenrick having left; does not say whether no-go zones exist.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
On Man City, surely the Prime Minister is right that alienating an important security and economic partner like Abu Dhabi, the owners of Man City, would be bad for this country.

Uh well, it's very interesting that now um Andy Burnham is telling us that it was actually Abu Dhabi that paid for Manchester's growth all along, rather than him. So, his story is certainly changing. Um look, the the the UAE um are our allies. As trade secretary, I did a lot of work with them. I think it is important that we maintain good relationships, but people still have to follow the rules.

And I do not endorse rule-breaking. You know, I know people think I might be a bit headmistressy about that, but um where rules are broken, then there need to be consequences. I've been saying this at conference. It's in the pamphlet I I um published on Sunday. I'll be talking about more of that tomorrow.

Uh let's look at what happened. I'm not a football expert. I've never pretended to be. It's Andy Burnham who goes around um pretending to be Mr. Football.

I don't know why he said what he said um on those comments, but let's let's take a look and see what's happened.

AnsweredAsked whether the Prime Minister is right that alienating Abu Dhabi would harm the country. Says the UAE are allies and good relations matter, but rules must be followed and breaches need consequences.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
Couple of other things. Um you'll understand why I'm asking you this. Are you a proud Zionist?

Uh I don't know I don't know what people mean by that, but I'm I'm certainly pro uh the state of Israel. They have a right to exist. I am very pro uh British Jews. Um I think that they are under threat in this country. Uh we need to protect them.

I see huge anti-Semitism uh uh or a huge increase in anti-Semitism in this country. I'm appalled by what the Green Party uh did at their conference. Uh throwing around words like Zionist uh you know, people like to use these labels. I'm not sure exactly what to these people mean by that, but if you mean supporting the state of Israel and its right to self-determination, yes, I do believe in that. I do believe in a two-state solution.

Um and I think that uh anyone who talks about uh there not being a state of Israel um is actually talking about wiping them off the face of the earth. I think that's completely wrong um and uh I will do everything I can to fight against that.

AnsweredAsked whether she is a proud Zionist. Says she is not sure what the label means, but if it means supporting Israel's right to exist and self-determination, yes, and she backs a two-state solution.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person
Robert Peston
would you say to the Green Party that says that since you support the existing state of Israel, you're a racist?

Well, uh I think that the Green Party is full of a lot of people who are anti-Semites and are quite frankly not okay. This is disgusting. This is These are not people whose opinions we should be uh respecting. These are people who we should be calling out as being shameful. Um I'm embarrassed that a political party in this country would actually do something like that.

AnsweredAsked what she would say to the Green Party, which calls supporters of Israel racist. Says many in the party are antisemites and its position is shameful.Our model rated thisNot yet reviewed by a person

Oh, I thought you were going to say something else. [laughter] Has she committed a crime? Or some sort Why is she being handcuffed?

Robert Peston
It's a TV It's a TV program. So, I'm going to ask you, since she's being handcuffed to Katie Price, would you rather be handcuffed to Nigel Farage or Andy Burnham for a day?

Oh my god. Like, this is just a horrible scenario that you're presenting in front of me. Can I just not be in a handcuffs at all? Both of them have their plusses and minuses. I'm sure both of them would actually pick me if they had to choose between the two of them.

Ceremonial, not rated: A light-hearted closing question about a reality TV show (handcuffed to Nigel Farage or Andy Burnham).